Why it matters
Google's guidelines say not to mark up content that readers cannot see, even if it is accurate. Irrelevant structured data can be treated as abusive: filters make it ineffective, and egregious cases lead to a manual action that removes rich result eligibility without affecting web ranking. Google said at Search Central Live that once it sees markup it does not trust from a site, it may stop using that site's structured data altogether.
How to meet it
Generate markup from the same fields that render the visible content, use it for the machine-precise form of visible facts (an ISO date for a shown date, the homepage url for a named organisation), and remove markup for content a page no longer shows.
How to test it
For each template, the Rich Results Test output matches what the page visibly shows, and the Manual actions report in Search Console is empty.
How Regensbot covers it
Regensbot proposes a verdict with the evidence; a person on your team confirms it.
The evidence comes from your verified site: its pages, its profile and the files you upload.
You verify the site by a DNS TXT record, a meta tag or a file. Regensbot then keeps a checklist item for this requirement, with a state, a guide, an evidence upload and reminders.
Sources
Google documents02
- 01General structured data guidelinesGoogle Search Central (opens in a new tab)
- 02Introduction to structured data markup in Google SearchGoogle Search Central (opens in a new tab)
Claims in the knowledge base05
- D2-C467SourceWhat is Structured Data and why we need it on the internet.Google's documentation
- D2-C500ConfirmedWhat is Structured Data and why we need it on the internet.Said on stage
- D2-C501SourceWhat is Structured Data and why we need it on the internet.Google's documentation
- D2-C468n/aWhat is Structured Data and why we need it on the internet.The author's interpretation
- D3-C647ConsistentHow long does it take to..?Said on stage
Claim IDs refer to the Search Central Live 2026 knowledge base. The knowledge base (opens in a new tab)
- Confirmed
- Google's documentation states the same thing.
- Consistent
- Google's documentation supports it without stating it.
- Source
- The claim is the cited document itself.
- n/a
- Nothing to verify: a quotation, framing, opinion or analysis.