Why it matters
Hacked content, placed on a site without permission through security vulnerabilities, is one of the spam types on Google's list; cleaning it up is hard and prevention is key. If it leads to a manual action, Google's help says most reconsideration reviews take several days or weeks; said at Search Central Live, removal takes one to two weeks on average, and for some sites the action stays because the owners never actually clean up.
How to meet it
Automate CMS, theme and plug-in updates, remove unused plug-ins and accounts, require two-factor login for editors, and alert on new URLs, outbound links or sitemap entries that no editor created. After a clean-up, file the reconsideration request only once every injected page and link is gone.
How to test it
A weekly comparison of the sitemap and a crawl with the CMS's own page list finds no unknown URLs; Search Console's Security issues and Manual actions reports are empty.
How Regensbot covers it
Regensbot proposes a verdict with the evidence; a person on your team confirms it.
The evidence comes from a crawl of your site. Where content needs judging, Claude proposes the verdict as an assistant judge and never fails a page on its own.
The crawl is polite: sitemap first, one request per second per host. A problem it finds is definite, and “none found” passes only on a complete crawl.
Sources
Google documents02
- 01Spam policies for Google web searchGoogle Search Central (opens in a new tab)
- 02Manual actions reportGoogle Search Console Help (opens in a new tab)
Claims in the knowledge base05
- D3-C282ConsistentWhat are quality updatesShown on screen
- D3-C277ConfirmedWhat are quality updatesShown on screen
- D3-C659ConsistentHow long does it take to..?Shown on screen
- D3-C674SourceHow long does it take to..?Google's documentation
- D3-C660ConsistentHow long does it take to..?Said on stage
Claim IDs refer to the Search Central Live 2026 knowledge base. The knowledge base (opens in a new tab)
- Confirmed
- Google's documentation states the same thing.
- Consistent
- Google's documentation supports it without stating it.
- Source
- The claim is the cited document itself.